Organized Staking, workplace, issue ,researcher, cult with positions in many organizations.

Organized Staking at the workplace: the research about this workplace issue

c42bd-1v_2art_htkwz3ehthhng6q

The researcher identified the behavior as organized stalking and described it as “emotional harassment” involving “hostile and unethical communication (including sorcery) directed in a systematic way by one or a few individuals mainly towards one individual.”

Example: Shortly after the foreigner left his last place of employment after experiencing the organized stalking phenomenon, he began to recognize that he was the target of subtle harassment out in public as well. This harassment was consistent with the harassment he experienced at his previous place of employment. He dismissed these acts of harassment as coincidence because he was not aware of the existence of organized stalking groups. He could not conceive of such an idea and had no existing model of reference to compare it to. Later he learned that there was a name for this workplace harassment: Emotional Abuse in the Workplace

It appears that the harassment that takes place out in public has many parts. One is composed of volunteers, and people who are paid. The second part are the people who are unaware they are part of this campaign, they are mind controlled to do certain things that fit into the harassment pattern. The other part is the mind controllers of the targeted individual, which aggravates every incident.

Many prominent, knowledgeable targets have concluded that this is no longer simply a group, but it has evolved into a stalking cult with positions in many organizations.

I experienced passive wiretapping and illegal active wiretapping on Whatsapp for pc and Facebook

Snooping, the unauthorized interception of information, is a form of disclosure. It is passive, suggesting simply that some entity is listening to (or reading) communications or browsing through files or system information. Wiretapping, or passive wiretapping, is a form of snooping in which a network is monitored. (It is called “wiretapping” because of the “wires” that compose the network, although the term is used even if no physical wiring is involved.) Confidentiality services should actively counter this threat.

Modification or alteration, an unauthorized change of information. The goal may be deception, in which some entity relies on the modified data to determine which action to take, or in which incorrect information is accepted as correct and is released. If the modified data controls the operation of the system, the threats of disruption and usurpation arise. Unlike snooping, modification is active; it results from an entity changing information. Active wiretapping is a form of modification in which data moving across a network is altered; the term “active” distinguishes it from snooping (“passive” wiretapping). An example is the man-in-the-middle attack, in which an intruder reads messages from the sender and sends (possibly modified) versions to the recipient, in hopes that the recipient and sender will not realize the presence of the intermediary. Integrity services should actively counter this threat.

Delay, a temporary inhibition of a service, is a form of usurpation, although it can play a supporting role in deception. Typically, delivery of a message or service requires some time t; if an attacker can force the delivery to take more than time t, the attacker has successfully delayed delivery. This requires manipulation of system control structures, such as network components or server components, and hence is a form of usurpation. If an entity is waiting for an authorization message that is delayed, it may query a secondary server for the authorization. Even though the attacker may be unable to masquerade as the primary server, she might be able to masquerade as that secondary server and supply incorrect information. Availability mechanisms can thwart this threat.

Denial of service, a long-term inhibition of service, is a form of usurpation, although it is often used with other mechanisms to deceive. The attacker prevents a server from providing a service. The denial may occur at the source (by preventing the server from obtaining the resources needed to perform its function), at the destination (by blocking the communications from the server), or along the intermediate path (by discarding messages from either the client or the server, or both). Denial of service poses the same threat as an infinite delay. Availability mechanisms counter this threat.

Denial of service or delay may result from direct attacks or from nonsecurity-related problems. From our point of view, the cause and result are important; the intention underlying them is not. If delay or denial of service compromises system security, or is part of a sequence of events leading to the compromise of a system, then we view it as an attempt to breach system security. But the attempt may not be deliberate; indeed, it may be the product of environmental characteristics rather than specific actions of an attacker.

WE KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING NWO

The mass media and education is used to break up the family unit, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young and even adults. Side benefits include depopulation and widening the tax base, single house ownership. Displacing men in the role of providers also destabilizes the family. The hidden goal of the NWO is to use cults and sects to destroy religion, the believe in our Almighty Creator.

Techniques, involving drug-induced hypnosis and pain shock or psychological shock, were eventually…

The conclusion of the investigation of the psychological effects of such treatments or techniques

I would suspect that they might tend to reduce resistance to hypnotic suggestions. It is conceivable, therefore, that psychological or medical treatments might be used to weaken difficult cases in order to produce a hypnotic trance of great depth. In 1958 the Bureau of Social Science Research (BSSR), a subcontractor to the Rand Corporation, issued a “technical report” on hypnosis to the air force that took up where the earlier Rand report had left off.

Once again a “think tank” was calling for action in the mind-control race against the Communists. “To both the lay person and the behavior scientist,” the author, wrote in the introduction, “hypnosis has long been regarded as a potentially powerful instrument for controlling human behavior. Undoubtedly, the intelligence divisions of many countries have given serious thought to this potential and have done classified research in various areas of hypnosis .. . it is conceivable . . • that these techniques could have been used and covered up so successfully that they might be impossible to recognize . . .”

He outlined areas of future research where Americans could advance in the mind-control race. He urged the government to develop tests to determine who was and who was not a good hypnotic subject. He urged further research in pharmacology, suggesting that a number of drugs little known at the time might be effective in inducing hypnosis. He predicted that some drugs would prove useful in reducing the amount of time required to induce complex hypnotic behavior and that others would be useful in reinforcing the lasting effects of hypnotically induced behavior control. He predicted that drugs would be developed which would permit far greater control over autonomic processes. Some drugs, he suggested, would be found to lower problem-solving ability compared to an age-matched average, to impair short-term memory, mathematical ability, analytical thinking, and spatial recognition and change perception as well. He also predicted that new drugs would be discovered which would be capable of inducing deep hypnosis in virtually any individual regardless of his degree of cooperativeness. All of these techniques, involving drug-induced hypnosis and pain shock or psychological shock, were eventually developed and used to reduce some of our own citizens to a zombie state in which they would blindly serve the government.

Regardless of the Constitution and the laws which supposedly protect the individual against government coercion, hypnotised citizens were covertly created to do the government’s more unsavory bidding. Such hypnotised citizens asked no questions about the legality of their assignments. Often their assignments were never consciously known. And if they were ever questioned about their own actions, amnesia protected them from self-incrimination. What had started out a race against the Communists slowly turned into a private war from within.

FCC just killed the last bit of freedom and equality left

Net Neutrality has been scrapped.

Now Free speech shall be called Paid speech and will be provided to you by the usual suspects. Thank these corrupt “representatives” and instutions of democracy for protecting you from the #truth.

The five-person board has voted in favour of ending net neutrality, a decision that could have a huge effect on the way the internet works.

Supporters of net neutrality say the move could open the door for internet service providers (ISPs) to charge customers more and dictate what people use the internet for.

The CIA is said to be an “invisible government,” yet it is the most visible, most externally scrutinized and most publicized intelligence service in the world

While the CIA sometimes is able to refute publicly allegations and criticism, usually it must remain silent. The result is a contradictory mix of images of the CIA and very little understanding of its real role in American government and other governments

Let’s not forget the CIA’s role in the foreign policy proces. First, the CIA is responsible for the collection and analysis of information and its distribution to policymakers.

The CIA slants or “cooks” its intelligence analysis to support covert actions or policy and controls policymakers (or their staffs) by selective use — and abuse — information to persuade superiors, Congress or the public. Beyond this, recent developments, such as the massive daily flow of intelligence information to Congress, have complicated the CIA’s relationships with the rest of the executive branch in ways not at all understood by most observers — including those most directly involved.